Vertebrates are remarkable for their ability to select and execute purposive actions: motor and cognitive skills executed at the right time and in the right manner to thrive in dynamic, often competitive, environments. A purposive action requires one to extract information from experience and act upon that information by executing the requisite movements to obtain a desired outcome. Subcortical basal ganglia circuits are a key link from the telencephalon to the mesencephalon; putative neural substrates of inference and action, respectively. Basal ganglia are a critical nexus thought to be especially important for modifying future action according to prior experience - reinforcement learning. Recent work from our group has led to the articulation of a mechanistic model of basal ganglia computation with substantial explanatory power. Briefly, we propose that basal ganglia can enact a history-dependent gain on descending neocortical activity. This gain can manifest as the regulation of movement vigor or the timing of actions depending upon what aspects of behavior are being reinforced. Ongoing work in the lab seeks to test key predictions that can be formulated from this perspective.
Although we often focus on the ability of a skilled movement to be executed rapidly and with precisely replicated kinematics; motor skill is also characterized by the flexibility with which an action can be executed while reliably achieving a goal. For example, the ability to flexibly act with a range of vigor (e.g. amplitude, speed) is an essential aspect of skill. Several lines of evidence suggest that basal ganglia play a critical role in the purposive control of movement vigor in mammals. To study the circuit mechanisms underlying the control of movement vigor we developed behavioral paradigms to study precise movement kinematics in mice performing voluntary movements of a joystick. In a genetic model of Parkinson's disease we found that parkinsonian mice also exhibit a profound enervation of joystick movements. Subsequent work provided a mechanistic account of these deficits in the absence of dopamine: closed-loop optogenetic stimulation we showed that dopamine-dependent plasticity allows specific cell types in basal ganglia to exert a bidirectional, opponent control over movement vigor. Ongoing work in the lab seeks to understand the principles that govern how basal ganglia control movement vigor. For exmaple, how are competing demands for specificity and generalization balanced?
The work in our lab combines large-scale extracellular electrophysiology, optical recording, and intracellular electrophysiology with techniques to identify and perturb the activity of specific cell types and circuits in the mouse brain. This constellation of technical approaches requires significant development of hardware and software for data acquisition and analysis. We are also actively involved in developing and refining molecular tools that allow us to identify, target, and manipulate specific cell-types in concert with physiology. In our recent work we have helped to develop and validate the cell-type specific pharmacology in vivo using DARTs and developed a new class of optogenetic inhibitor exemplified by FLInChR.
We draw heavily upon the expertise of many staff scientists and engineers in the jET, Virus Services, Transgenic Mouse Facility, and Scientific Computing. Some of the fruits of our labor can be found on the resources section of the website where there are details about how to recreate the hardware developed for our experiments and software available for download.
At their best systems neuroscience, cognitive science and psychology have all contributed to the development of deep insights into the algorithms that account for detailed, quantitative aspects of overt behavior. Systems neuroscience has had influential successes in the observation of neural activity that correlates with (represents) key elements (quantities, dynamics, etc.) computations that could implement such algorithms. In recent years it has become increasingly possible to manipulate activity in increasingly precise ways in attempts to demonstrate that these computations are causally related to the observed behavior. Mechanistic models of circuit computations ultimately require detailed understanding of how the biophysics of individual neurons and properties of connectivity implement observed computations. Drawing upon our background in cellular biophysics and synaptic plasticity, we also seek to articulate how biophysical properties of neurons, synaptic plasticity rules, and patterns of anatomical connectivity give rise to circuit computations. In recent work we have described how the reward prediction error correlate results from temporal integration of two dissociable pathways and how recurrent connectivity in substantia nigra implements feedback gain control.